|
|
|
Abstraction |
|
Our essential life-giver, water, is under
increasing pressure from proposed housing developments,
uneconomic and often wasted supply and increasingly erratic
climatic changes. Whether you believe that
water privatisation should never have happened or that current
charges are already too high, the fact remains that if
abstraction is allowed to continue unabated, the continued
health and diversity of our environment is severely at risk.
At Branch level, we are especially concerned about the demands
being placed on the River Ouse and the effects on the rich
aquatic life which it is struggling to support, including sea
trout, indigenous brown trout, lamprey and bullheads.
Our National Officers continue to lobby Government on this very
important topic whilst at local level the Branch, via our Water
Resources Officer, represents our views via the Environment
Agency's Catchment Area Management Strategy (CAMS). Recent
correspondence in this issue, at both National and Branch level
can be seen via the
Home and
National News
links above. |
|
Pollution, both accidental and deliberate,
continues to affect our water resources and sadly, it seems that
planning permission for discharge into our rivers is all too
easy to obtain as long as the very minimum of precautionary
measures are proposed. The paradox is that on occasion,
the polluted waters are in danger of being abstracted for
domestic supply! The Branch endeavours to make its
concerns known to those in authority. Again,
recent correspondence on the issue can be found via the
Home link -
"Latest News". |
|
The Branch has been concerned about two landfill
proposals which could have adversely effected the local river systems.
The first was an application for landfill at the Freshfield Lane
brickworks. Although this is outside the Branch
geographical boundaries, landfill at that site could have
had serious repercussions for the River Ouse, since both the
Cockhaise and Danehill Brooks, which feed the Ouse, are adjacent
to the sight. The possibility of dangerous chemicals
leeching into the Ouse being very real.
The second proposal was for a landfill site at
the old Chailey brickworks, allegedly to receive hazardous
materials from all over the country. Again, leeching
onto the Bevern Stream (one of the Ouse's main spawning streams
for sea trout) was of great concern.
For the time being, it appears
that both schemes have been shelved, following representations
from residents, environmental lobbyists and ourselves.
However, we cannot be complacent and assume that proposals such
as these will simply go away. We will continue to voice
our concerns, whenever such schemes are a potential threat to
the health of our river systems. Click on
Home to link to
read the historical correspondence. |
|
Navigation |
| Whilst not wishing to appear as killjoys, the Branch has
also expressed its concern about proposals to reintroduce
navigation of the Ouse, for leisure purposes.
Although historically, the Ouse provided an important
transport artery, that era of industrial activity has
gone. With its disappearance, optimism has grown
that the Ouse can (and should) recover its status as one
of England's prime sea trout rivers.
Reintroduction of navigation would be detrimental to the
ecology of the river and only add to the already huge
pressures being placed upon it. To see the recent EA
Position Statement on the proposals, click
here. |
|
|
|
Lord suffer me to catch a
fish,
So large that even I,
When talking of it
afterwards,
Will have no need to lie. |
|