Mr. I. Blake
Transport and Environment
East Sussex County Council
C4 Waste and Minerals Policy (AP)
Freepost (LW43)
Lewes
BN7 1BR
February 2nd
2010
Dear Mr Blake,
Re: East Sussex
County Council Waste & Minerals Care Strategy Consultation, Land
disposal site to the east of Gold Bridge and south of the A272
between Newick and Piltdown: Policy CS6.
The Salmon & Trout Association (S&TA) is a charity supported
by game anglers campaigning for the sustainable management and
conservation of water, the aquatic environment and the fish and many
other species which rely upon it for their existence. We have
11,000 individual members and 250 clubs throughout the UK.
We would particularly like to support the letter sent to you
on the above planning application on January 8th by the
Chairman of our East Sussex Branch, Dr Roderick Yuill. He
illustrated very well the issues involved with this application for
a land disposal site at Piltdown, and I will not repeat much of what
he said.
However, from a national perspective, this Association has
distinct concerns over the potential for this site to leach
contaminants into the nearby River Ouse, an important river in the
South East of England for sea trout and brown trout, both
Biodiversity Action Plan species, and bullhead, a designated species
under the EU Habitats Directive. These fish are under threat, and
any likelihood that they could be further impacted by human
interference should be taken extremely seriously when contemplating
this application at Committee stage.
You will be aware, I am sure, that measures to achieve good
ecological status under the EU Water Framework Directive began in
January this year. One of the main objectives of the Directive is
that rivers should not experience any further decline in ecological
quality, and all should achieve good status by 2015 or, failing
that, by the latest 2027. It goes without saying that a land
disposal site such as this would only have to fail very irregularly
over long time spans to have a significant impact on the Ouse, its
aquatic habitats, fish and water-dependent species, leading to
failure of the WFD objectives and possible infraction under European
law. I have no doubt that, with the shortage of water available for
potable supply in the region, it would also have a severe impact on
drinking water, potentially contravening the Drinking Water
Directive.
S&TA and our colleagues in many other fisheries and
conservation organisations are working very hard to alleviate the
problems that a highly populated and managed island has on its
natural water resources. While we appreciate that the South East of
England has particular problems with water and waste disposal, we
feel that above application should be refused on the grounds that
contaminated leachate from the site could have serious and long
lasting impact on the River Ouse, its habitats and dependent
species.
Yours sincerely,

Paul Knight
Chief Executive